Tag: Market

Free Market Capitalism is the Worst Economic System

…Except For Every Other System Ever Tried

Sir Winston Churchill famously quipped: “It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried.” With apologies to Mr. Churchill, I would suggest a modernization of that quote based on today’s political/economic environment in the United States. You hear a lot about the “failure of capitalism,” and how bad it is compared with the socialist Utopia long sought by progressives; but in reality, free-market capitalism far outpaces any other economic system.

For proof, look no further than the only nation in history which has actually employed free-market capitalism for many decades, and his created more wealth than any other. In America, the lot of the poorest people would be the envy of many in other nations, where the poorest do not own things like microwave ovens and multiple televisions.

Today’s left-leaning leaders have convinced many of us (though no longer a majority) that government can and should do more for us by keeping taxes high and spending billions on social programs. They are taking us toward the sort of “social democracy” they have in, say, Europe. Never mind that Europe has been trying to catch up with us since days after the end of World War II… for some reason we have elected a crew that envies Europe and its socialist systems.

Here are three big problems with that:

Investment Seeks A Free Market.

When a government jerks up taxes, investors take their capital somewhere else where they have a better chance of making it grow. Ireland proved this, leading the way in Europe by lowering taxes and reducing regulations, and they’ve benefited by a large influx of investment (which always brings jobs). Spain, on the other hand, invested billions in creating “green jobs,” essentially constraining the sort of investment they would allow in their country, and now their economy totters on the brink of disaster in the wake of revelations that for every “green job” they created, they destroyed more than two other jobs. (By the way, the President announced today a similar program of “investments” coming soon to an economy near you – if you’re in the United States.) Donald Trump echoed this in a television interview today, predicting that if the government follows through with its promise to end the “Bush tax cuts” from 2001 and 2003, a great out-flow from America – of investors, capital, businesses, and jobs – would be inevitable. On the other hand, experts have suggested that if all taxes in the U.S. were slashed to a flat rate of something around 12 per cent, there would be a flood of money into the U.S. and the economy would soar… and, instead of a drain on the federal treasury, all that business would create a commensurate flood of tax revenue that would be the best hope of avoiding the economic disaster invited by the current tax-and-spend, impossible-deficit policy. Even within the U.S., businesses are fleeing high-tax states like California and New York and flooding into low- (or no-) tax states like Texas and Florida.

You Will Not Get What You Pay For With Socialism.

In country after country, when they go to government-run health care, the cost of care goes up and the quality of care goes down. Governments simply cannot force health care to be good… but the free market can entice it to be great. That’s only one example; of course, progressives would like the government to control virtually everything (in the name of “fairness”). All that spending, though, has created an entirely unsustainable debt and deficit that we will never be able to pay off unless we quickly change course. Luckily, in America, we can do that… but to change course, we’ll have to change governments.

Say Goodbye To Inspiration… And Greatness.

The profit motive made America the most prosperous nation in the history of the world. The possibility of getting rich is a beautiful thing: it creates the next Big Idea, it makes wonderful technologies available and affordable, it gives everyone a reason to do business better, smarter and faster than a competitor. Socialism, though, seeks to remove the profit motive in the interest of trying to make everyone end up with the same outcome. When it becomes obvious that you’ll never enjoy more wealth than your less-inspired neighbor (that wouldn’t be “fair,” after all), you may think your altruism will kick in and make you create the next great enterprise… but I wouldn’t bet on it. To be at their best, entrepreneurs need to be inspired by competition they can beat, money they can make, good they can do, and customers they can delight.

Henry David Thoreau said “That government is best which governs least, because its people discipline themselves.” This is a philosophy directly opposed to that espoused by today’s U.S.government; they govern as if their basic principle is “Some people cannot discipline themselves, so we have to do it for them, and govern everyone’s lives in every respect.” How uninspiring. What’s more, it just doesn’t work – it’s been tried in state after failed state. For all its greed, inequity, and other flaws, the free market is still the best hope of everyone, from rich to poor. And if we lose it here in America, where will the rest of the world go when they need a break from the sad fairness of socialism?



Source by Michael Hume

This article is brought to you by Kokula Krishna Hari Kunasekaran! Visit Website or Follow back at @kkkhari

Do You Market To These Emotions Online?

What can Mother Theresa and Charles Schwab teach you about marketing online.

Certainly these two historical figures saw two vastly different worlds in their lifetimes. Mother Theresa spent hers with the poorest of the poor, while Charles Schwab spent his with the richest of the rich.

But look at these two famous quotes.

"There is more hunger in this world for love and appreciation than for bread" Mother Teresa

"I have yet to find a man, however exalted his station, who did not do better work and put forth greater effort under a spirit of approval than under a spirit of criticism." Charles Schwab

Do you see the underlying thread?

Regardless of who you are selling to, from one end of the social spectrum to the other, and everywhere in between, human beings are looking for appreciation, and approval, above all else.

Show your customers how the use of your product yields a sense of importance, and recognition, or how it helps them avoid embarrassment and indifference, and you will make many more sales than if you simply describe the qualities of your product.

But it takes a certain kind of selling to pull this off.

While your advertising can speak directly about the features of your product, and explain what those features do for your customer, it is much more difficult to transfer emotional meaning with the same directness.

Yet it is the emotions that trigger desire in the buyer. As an advertiser, it is your job to bring those desires that already exist in the buyers mind to the fore. To stir them to life, so to speak. And the best way to do that is through indirection.

By wrapping your sales message up in a story, you give your prospect permission to imagine. You're not telling them how they should feel. They instinctively project themselves into the tale. They can't help themselves. It's what we all learnt to do as little children.

Remember this. Without imagination, there is no desire, and without desire, there is no action.

When someone comes to your website and reads your copy, do they see themselves using your product? Do they see themselves living the results of using it? Even more importantly, do they see others approving of them, and appreciating them for having done so?

That may sound like a strange way of thinking about a product, but let me give you an example of what I'm talking about.

Let's say you're selling a diet plan. How do you use indirection and storytelling to trigger your prospect's desire for it?

You might talk to your overweight potential client like this …
————————————————– ————————————–
Imagine yourself walking briskly along a hot, sandy, sun drenched beach. An azure haze hangs over the skyline as the warm wind caresses your bare skin.

As you stride confidently to your favorite spot, your breathing is normal, and your body relaxed. You smile to yourself, knowing you could walk for miles like this without becoming fatigued.

The beach is busy, and as you glance around you catch the eye of someone of the opposite sex. They smile at you, and you smile back.
You walk assuredly into the water, and swim a couple of hundred yards out and back with ease. Lying back on your towel you can't help but think …

'Life Has Never Been So Good'

OK, now stop dreaming, and answer this question. Did you have a little trouble seeing yourself in that picture? If so, then take heart.

A slim, sexy figure and abundant self-esteem can now be yours, thanks to the amazingly simple and easy to follow …

————————————————– —————————————-

Do you see how indirection works? You don't have to come right out and tell your potential client people will appreciate them, and approve of them as a result of what your product can do. You don't have to tell them they'll no longer feel embarrassed by their weight in social situations.

The story does it for you. Now you've got their undivided attention, and a real chance to prove your product is unique and that it works.

Copyright 2005 Daniel Levis



Source by Daniel Levis

This article is brought to you by Kokula Krishna Hari Kunasekaran! Visit Website or Follow back at @kkkhari

Free Market Capitalism is the Worst Economic System

… Except For Every Other System Ever Tried

Sir Winston Churchill famously quipped: "It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried." With apologies to Mr. Churchill, I would suggest a modernization of that quote based on today's political / economic environment in the United States. You hear a lot about the "failure of capitalism," and how bad it is compared with the socialist Utopia long sought by progressives; but in reality, free-market capitalism far outpaces any other economic system.

For proof, look no further than the only nation in history which has actually employed free-market capitalism for many decades, and his created more wealth than any other. In America, the lot of the poorest people would be the envy of many in other nations, where the poorest do not own things like microwave ovens and multiple televisions.

Today's left-leaning leaders have convinced many of us (though no longer a majority) that government can and should do more for us by keeping taxes high and spending billions on social programs. They are taking us toward the sort of "social democracy" they have in, say, Europe. Never mind that Europe has been trying to catch up with us since days after the end of World War II … for some reason we have elected a crew that envies Europe and its socialist systems.

Here are three big problems with that:

Investment Seeks A Free Market.

When a government jerks up taxes, investors take their capital somewhere else where they have a better chance of making it grow. Ireland proved this, leading the way in Europe by lowering taxes and reducing regulations, and they've benefited by a large influx of investment (which always brings jobs). Spain, on the other hand, invested billions in creating "green jobs," essentially constraining the sort of investment they would allow in their country, and now their economy totters on the brink of disaster in the wake of revelations that for every "green job "they created, they destroyed more than two other jobs. (By the way, the President announced today a similar program of "investments" coming soon to an economy near you – if you're in the United States.) Donald Trump echoed this in a television interview today, predicting that if the government follows through with its promise to end the "Bush tax cuts" from 2001 and 2003, a great out-flow from America – of investors, capital, businesses, and jobs – would be inevitable. On the other hand, experts have suggested that if all taxes in the US were slashed to a flat rate of something around 12 per cent, there would be a flood of money into the US and the economy would soar … and, instead of a drain on the federal treasury, all that business would create a commensurate flood of tax revenue that would be the best hope of avoiding the economic disaster invited by the current tax-and-spend, impossible-deficit policy. Even within the US, businesses are fleeing high-tax states like California and New York and flooding into low- (or no-) tax states like Texas and Florida.

You Will Not Get What You Pay For With Socialism.

In country after country, when they go to government-run health care, the cost of care goes up and the quality of care goes down. Governments simply cannot force health care to be good … but the free market can entice it to be great. That's only one example; of course, progressives would like the government to control virtually everything (in the name of "fairness"). All that spending, though, has created an entirely unsustainable debt and deficit that we will never be able to pay off unless we quickly change course. Luckily, in America, we can do that … but to change course, we'll have to change governments.

Say Goodbye To Inspiration … And Greatness.

The profit motive made America the most prosperous nation in the history of the world. The possibility of getting rich is a beautiful thing: it creates the next Big Idea, it makes wonderful technologies available and affordable, it gives everyone a reason to do business better, smarter and faster than a competitor. Socialism, though, seeks to remove the profit motive in the interest of trying to make everyone end up with the same outcome. When it becomes obvious that you'll never enjoy more wealth than your less-inspired neighbor (that wouldn't be "fair," after all), you may think your altruism will kick in and make you create the next great enterprise .. But I wouldn't bet on it. To be at their best, entrepreneurs need to be inspired by competition they can beat, money they can make, good they can do, and customers they can delight.

Henry David Thoreau said "That government is best which governs least, because its people discipline themselves." This is a philosophy directly opposed to that espoused by today's USgovernment; they govern as if their basic principle is "Some people cannot discipline themselves, so we have to do it for them, and govern everyone's lives in every respect." How uninspiring. What's more, it just doesn't work – it's been tried in state after failed state. For all its greed, inequity, and other flaws, the free market is still the best hope of everyone, from rich to poor. And if we lose it here in America, where will the rest of the world go when they need a break from the sad fairness of socialism?



Source by Michael Hume

This article is brought to you by Kokula Krishna Hari Kunasekaran! Visit Website or Follow back at @kkkhari

The Donald Trump Stock Market

In early 2009, if you bought biotech stocks, you would have made over 400% when the sector peaked in 2015. What was going on in early 2009 that would have clued you in that biotech stocks were going to be a good bet?

Barack Obama. That's right: Barack Obama was inaugurated president of the United States in January 2009.

Sophisticated investors like me track presidential campaigns to see if a candidate might favor a group of stocks.

It wasn't any great surprise to find that once Obama's administration was good for biotech stocks.

That's because, if you were tracking Obama, you would have seen that his inner circle of advisers had an unusually high number of people who were pro-biotech. And among his closest advisers was a Harvard Law classmate who was an expert in the biotech industry. Obama also spoke very highly of the industry.

The most visible sign of this is the record number of drugs approved in 2015: 45. That's the highest number of drugs approved since 1996. These drug approvals have been one of the main reasons for biotech soaring higher during Obama's tenure.

Bottom line: A new body in the White House often leads to shifts in which sectors and industries are expanding and which are contracting. As we stare down at a new presidential election, now is a good time to start planning for another shift in the stock market so you are well-positioned to profit …

Presidential candidates from both parties have bombarded us with all kinds of ads. But, for a pure investor, who simply wants to make money without worrying about politics, you have to keep your focus on things that a presidential candidate might actually get done if they get elected.

So, if you look at the presidential campaigns in this light, you'll hear candidates giving glimpses of their policies and the industries and companies that are most likely to benefit. And that's a chance for you make big money in the stock market.

Blue-Collar America Is Trump Nation

This week, I want to look in on the candidate who has shaken up this election cycle. Love him or hate him, Donald Trump stands a good chance of becoming president of the United States, particularly following his triumph on Super Tuesday when he clenched seven of the 11 states.

If you're following the election closely, you know that Trump's base of voters has some very specific characteristics.

First, research shows Trump's voter base lives in rural America, rather than in the cities.

Studies show that the people most attracted to Trump have seen stagnant wages for 15 years, and have seen almost no improvement in their financial condition since the 2008 financial crisis.

A Washington Post poll has 50% of people making less than $ 50,000 a year voting for Trump.

Last thing, a CNN survey shows that 46% of people supporting Trump don't have college degrees.

In short, a significant number of Trump voters are people who are Blue-Collar America. People who work in construction and manufacturing – not offices.

Trump voters represent a huge slice of America, and their support is going to give him a chance to be the next president of the United States.

Donald Trump Will Goose US Manufacturing and Infrastructure

Now, if Donald Trump wins, you can expect him to do things to benefit the people who elected him, just like every president.

That means you should expect President Trump to follow through on some of the big things that he's been saying during the campaign.

One of Trump's top promises is to negotiate much better trade deals so that we get to sell more stuff that we are making in the United States. If Trump's trade deals are better, it would lead to increased selling of US-made products around the world. More US-made stuff sold around the world would mean more jobs for people who are voting for Trump.

Companies such as General Electric and 3M still make their products in the United States. For people who work on the factory floor at these companies, that's good because they could get higher salaries when these companies end up having more business.

Donald Trump also says he wants to rebuild the infrastructure in the United States.

Building infrastructure is good for the people who are voting for Trump, because people without college degrees fill many infrastructure positions.

Second, by increasing the number of non-college jobs, the demand for employees is going to go up. Rising demand for employees often results in salaries climbing – a big issue for many potential Trump voters.

If Trump Keeps Winning …

Making a long story short, a Donald Trump presidency will likely result in policies that benefit Blue-Collar America by boosting construction and manufacturing.

And that's going to create a great opportunity on Wall Street, because these companies will end up with more sales and report stronger earnings because of Trump's policies.



Source by Paul Mampilly

This article is brought to you by Kokula Krishna Hari Kunasekaran! Visit Website or Follow back at @kkkhari

Do You Market To These Emotions Online?

What can Mother Theresa and Charles Schwab teach you about marketing online.

Certainly these two historical figures saw two vastly different worlds in their lifetimes. Mother Theresa spent hers with the poorest of the poor, while Charles Schwab spent his with the richest of the rich.

But look at these two famous quotes.

“There is more hunger in this world for love and appreciation than for bread” Mother Teresa

“I have yet to find a man, however exalted his station, who did not do better work and put forth greater effort under a spirit of approval than under a spirit of criticism.” Charles Schwab

Do you see the underlying thread?

Regardless of who you are selling to, from one end of the social spectrum to the other, and everywhere in between, human beings are looking for appreciation, and approval, above all else.

Show your customers how the use of your product yields a sense of importance, and recognition, or how it helps them avoid embarrassment and indifference, and you will make many more sales than if you simply describe the qualities of your product.

But it takes a certain kind of selling to pull this off.

While your advertising can speak directly about the features of your product, and explain what those features do for your customer, it is much more difficult to transfer emotional meaning with the same directness.

Yet it is the emotions that trigger desire in the buyer. As an advertiser, it is your job to bring those desires that already exist in the buyers mind to the fore. To stir them to life, so to speak. And the best way to do that is through indirection.

By wrapping your sales message up in a story, you give your prospect permission to imagine. You’re not telling them how they should feel. They instinctively project themselves into the tale. They can’t help themselves. It’s what we all learnt to do as little children.

Remember this. Without imagination, there is no desire, and without desire, there is no action.

When someone comes to your website and reads your copy, do they see themselves using your product? Do they see themselves living the results of using it? Even more importantly, do they see others approving of them, and appreciating them for having done so?

That may sound like a strange way of thinking about a product, but let me give you an example of what I’m talking about.

Let’s say you’re selling a diet plan. How do you use indirection and storytelling to trigger your prospect’s desire for it?

You might talk to your overweight potential client like this…

—————————————————————————————-

Imagine yourself walking briskly along a hot, sandy, sun drenched beach. An azure haze hangs over the skyline as the warm wind caresses your bare skin.

As you stride confidently to your favorite spot, your breathing is normal, and your body relaxed. You smile to yourself, knowing you could walk for miles like this without becoming fatigued.

The beach is busy, and as you glance around you catch the eye of someone of the opposite sex. They smile at you, and you smile back.

You walk assuredly into the water, and swim a couple of hundred yards out and back with ease. Lying back on your towel you can’t help but think…

‘Life Has Never Been So Good’

OK, now stop dreaming, and answer this question. Did you have a little trouble seeing yourself in that picture? If so, then take heart.

A slim, sexy figure and abundant self-esteem can now be yours, thanks to the amazingly simple and easy to follow…

——————————————————————————————

Do you see how indirection works? You don’t have to come right out and tell your potential client people will appreciate them, and approve of them as a result of what your product can do. You don’t have to tell them they’ll no longer feel embarrassed by their weight in social situations.

The story does it for you. Now you’ve got their undivided attention, and a real chance to prove your product is unique and that it works.

Copyright 2005 Daniel Levis



Source by Daniel Levis

This article is brought to you by Kokula Krishna Hari Kunasekaran! Visit Website or Follow back at @kkkhari

Free Market Capitalism is the Worst Economic System

…Except For Every Other System Ever Tried

Sir Winston Churchill famously quipped: “It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried.” With apologies to Mr. Churchill, I would suggest a modernization of that quote based on today’s political/economic environment in the United States. You hear a lot about the “failure of capitalism,” and how bad it is compared with the socialist Utopia long sought by progressives; but in reality, free-market capitalism far outpaces any other economic system.

For proof, look no further than the only nation in history which has actually employed free-market capitalism for many decades, and his created more wealth than any other. In America, the lot of the poorest people would be the envy of many in other nations, where the poorest do not own things like microwave ovens and multiple televisions.

Today’s left-leaning leaders have convinced many of us (though no longer a majority) that government can and should do more for us by keeping taxes high and spending billions on social programs. They are taking us toward the sort of “social democracy” they have in, say, Europe. Never mind that Europe has been trying to catch up with us since days after the end of World War II… for some reason we have elected a crew that envies Europe and its socialist systems.

Here are three big problems with that:

Investment Seeks A Free Market.

When a government jerks up taxes, investors take their capital somewhere else where they have a better chance of making it grow. Ireland proved this, leading the way in Europe by lowering taxes and reducing regulations, and they’ve benefited by a large influx of investment (which always brings jobs). Spain, on the other hand, invested billions in creating “green jobs,” essentially constraining the sort of investment they would allow in their country, and now their economy totters on the brink of disaster in the wake of revelations that for every “green job” they created, they destroyed more than two other jobs. (By the way, the President announced today a similar program of “investments” coming soon to an economy near you – if you’re in the United States.) Donald Trump echoed this in a television interview today, predicting that if the government follows through with its promise to end the “Bush tax cuts” from 2001 and 2003, a great out-flow from America – of investors, capital, businesses, and jobs – would be inevitable. On the other hand, experts have suggested that if all taxes in the U.S. were slashed to a flat rate of something around 12 per cent, there would be a flood of money into the U.S. and the economy would soar… and, instead of a drain on the federal treasury, all that business would create a commensurate flood of tax revenue that would be the best hope of avoiding the economic disaster invited by the current tax-and-spend, impossible-deficit policy. Even within the U.S., businesses are fleeing high-tax states like California and New York and flooding into low- (or no-) tax states like Texas and Florida.

You Will Not Get What You Pay For With Socialism.

In country after country, when they go to government-run health care, the cost of care goes up and the quality of care goes down. Governments simply cannot force health care to be good… but the free market can entice it to be great. That’s only one example; of course, progressives would like the government to control virtually everything (in the name of “fairness”). All that spending, though, has created an entirely unsustainable debt and deficit that we will never be able to pay off unless we quickly change course. Luckily, in America, we can do that… but to change course, we’ll have to change governments.

Say Goodbye To Inspiration… And Greatness.

The profit motive made America the most prosperous nation in the history of the world. The possibility of getting rich is a beautiful thing: it creates the next Big Idea, it makes wonderful technologies available and affordable, it gives everyone a reason to do business better, smarter and faster than a competitor. Socialism, though, seeks to remove the profit motive in the interest of trying to make everyone end up with the same outcome. When it becomes obvious that you’ll never enjoy more wealth than your less-inspired neighbor (that wouldn’t be “fair,” after all), you may think your altruism will kick in and make you create the next great enterprise… but I wouldn’t bet on it. To be at their best, entrepreneurs need to be inspired by competition they can beat, money they can make, good they can do, and customers they can delight.

Henry David Thoreau said “That government is best which governs least, because its people discipline themselves.” This is a philosophy directly opposed to that espoused by today’s U.S.government; they govern as if their basic principle is “Some people cannot discipline themselves, so we have to do it for them, and govern everyone’s lives in every respect.” How uninspiring. What’s more, it just doesn’t work – it’s been tried in state after failed state. For all its greed, inequity, and other flaws, the free market is still the best hope of everyone, from rich to poor. And if we lose it here in America, where will the rest of the world go when they need a break from the sad fairness of socialism?



Source by Michael Hume

This article is brought to you by Kokula Krishna Hari Kunasekaran! Visit Website or Follow back at @kkkhari

The Donald Trump Stock Market

In early 2009, if you bought biotech stocks, you would have made over 400% when the sector peaked in 2015. What was going on in early 2009 that would have clued you in that biotech stocks were going to be a good bet?

Barack Obama. That’s right: Barack Obama was inaugurated president of the United States in January 2009.

Sophisticated investors like me track presidential campaigns to see if a candidate might favor a group of stocks.

It wasn’t any great surprise to find that once Obama’s administration was good for biotech stocks.

That’s because, if you were tracking Obama, you would have seen that his inner circle of advisers had an unusually high number of people who were pro-biotech. And among his closest advisers was a Harvard Law classmate who was an expert in the biotech industry. Obama also spoke very highly of the industry.

The most visible sign of this is the record number of drugs approved in 2015: 45. That’s the highest number of drugs approved since 1996. These drug approvals have been one of the main reasons for biotech soaring higher during Obama’s tenure.

Bottom line: A new body in the White House often leads to shifts in which sectors and industries are expanding and which are contracting. As we stare down at a new presidential election, now is a good time to start planning for another shift in the stock market so you are well-positioned to profit…

Presidential candidates from both parties have bombarded us with all kinds of ads. But, for a pure investor, who simply wants to make money without worrying about politics, you have to keep your focus on things that a presidential candidate might actually get done if they get elected.

So, if you look at the presidential campaigns in this light, you’ll hear candidates giving glimpses of their policies and the industries and companies that are most likely to benefit. And that’s a chance for you make big money in the stock market.

Blue-Collar America Is Trump Nation

This week, I want to look in on the candidate who has shaken up this election cycle. Love him or hate him, Donald Trump stands a good chance of becoming president of the United States, particularly following his triumph on Super Tuesday when he clenched seven of the 11 states.

If you’re following the election closely, you know that Trump’s base of voters has some very specific characteristics.

First, research shows Trump’s voter base lives in rural America, rather than in the cities.

Studies show that the people most attracted to Trump have seen stagnant wages for 15 years, and have seen almost no improvement in their financial condition since the 2008 financial crisis.

A Washington Post poll has 50% of people making less than $50,000 a year voting for Trump.

Last thing, a CNN survey shows that 46% of people supporting Trump don’t have college degrees.

In short, a significant number of Trump voters are people who are Blue-Collar America. People who work in construction and manufacturing – not offices.

Trump voters represent a huge slice of America, and their support is going to give him a chance to be the next president of the United States.

Donald Trump Will Goose U.S. Manufacturing and Infrastructure

Now, if Donald Trump wins, you can expect him to do things to benefit the people who elected him, just like every president.

That means you should expect President Trump to follow through on some of the big things that he’s been saying during the campaign.

One of Trump’s top promises is to negotiate much better trade deals so that we get to sell more stuff that we are making in the United States. If Trump’s trade deals are better, it would lead to increased selling of U.S.-made products around the world. More U.S.-made stuff sold around the world would mean more jobs for people who are voting for Trump.

Companies such as General Electric and 3M still make their products in the United States. For people who work on the factory floor at these companies, that’s good because they could get higher salaries when these companies end up having more business.

Donald Trump also says he wants to rebuild the infrastructure in the United States.

Building infrastructure is good for the people who are voting for Trump, because people without college degrees fill many infrastructure positions.

Second, by increasing the number of non-college jobs, the demand for employees is going to go up. Rising demand for employees often results in salaries climbing – a big issue for many potential Trump voters.

If Trump Keeps Winning…

Making a long story short, a Donald Trump presidency will likely result in policies that benefit Blue-Collar America by boosting construction and manufacturing.

And that’s going to create a great opportunity on Wall Street, because these companies will end up with more sales and report stronger earnings because of Trump’s policies.



Source by Paul Mampilly

This article is brought to you by Kokula Krishna Hari Kunasekaran! Visit Website or Follow back at @kkkhari